Molder Outpaces Hatcher Spending as Election Nears
New disclosures show the Democratic nominee has spent nearly $3 million in the race, more than double the Republican's total.
By Fernando Rojas ·

Campaign finance reports released this week show Chaz Molder continuing to outspend Charlie Hatcher in the 5th Congressional District race. The Democratic nominee reported raising $134,515.98 during the first two weeks of October. In that same period, Molder spent $650,548.70.
Hatcher, the Republican nominee, reported lower figures for the same timeframe. The candidate raised $71,404.67 and spent $307,688.68. This amount is less than half of what Molder spent. Molder also reported a larger cash balance on hand compared to Hatcher.
The spending gap has widened over the course of the election cycle. As of October 14, Molder had spent nearly $3 million total. Hatcher had reported spending $1.22 million since launching his campaign last year. This puts the Democratic nominee's total expenditure at more than twice the Republican's.
The financial disclosures highlight the disparity in resources between the two candidates as they enter the final weeks of the race. Molder's campaign has maintained a consistent lead in both fundraising and spending throughout the period covered by the reports.
Hatcher's campaign reported a smaller but steady level of activity. The candidate's total spending since starting the race remains under $1.25 million. The difference in outlay reflects the varying scales of operation between the two sides of the contest.
The data comes from standard campaign finance filings submitted to regulators. These documents provide a snapshot of the financial health of the campaigns. The figures for the first two weeks of October serve as the most recent update available to the public.
Voters in Davidson County will choose between Molder and Hatcher in the upcoming election. The spending patterns suggest a significant investment by the Democratic side to reach constituents. The reports do not detail specific uses of the funds, only the total amounts raised and spent.
Source: Nashville Banner · original report published
More Politics · Nashville news · Report a business · Got a Story?






